India is the world’s second-largest vegetable producer, with horticulture (including vegetables) contributing about one-third of agricultural value-added. In 2023–24 India produced over 209 million tonnes of vegetables on 11.24 million hectares. High-quality seed is the foundation of this productivity: as one study notes, “without high-quality seeds, the impact of other inputs will be limited” and “good quality seed is essential”. In the private vegetable seed market, millions of smallholders buy hybrid and improved varieties each year. Some farmers become repeat buyers of the same brand or hybrid, while others switch based on perceived benefits. This article examines farmer loyalty and repeat purchase behavior in India’s vegetable seed sector. We define loyalty concepts (marketing definitions and theory) and review behavioral economics (perceived value, satisfaction, trust, switching costs) in the seed context. We then survey recent Indian studies on repeat seed purchases (in Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, etc.), analyze drivers (seed quality, yield, brand image, dealer trust, availability, credit), and discuss private‐sector marketing strategies (demo plots, finance, packaging, branding). Key challenges (counterfeit seeds, seasonal shortages, price pressures, regulation) are highlighted, with case examples in tomato, chilli, brinjal, and okra. The chapter concludes with recommendations for seed companies, agri-dealers, and policymakers to strengthen farmer loyalty.
Concepts and Theory of Loyalty
Farmer loyalty and repeat purchase – definitions. In marketing, brand loyalty is seen as a customer’s commitment to repurchase a preferred brand consistently over time, even in the face of alternatives. Oliver (1999) defined loyalty as “a deeply held commitment to repurchase a preferred product causing repetitive same-brand purchasing, despite situational influences”. In practical terms, loyalty is often measured by repeat purchase behavior: a farmer who buys the same seed brand or variety again and again. For example, one source notes that a “repeat purchase may indicate client loyalty towards a specific brand”. Loyal farmers effectively become regular customers and may even recommend the brand to others. In sum, farmer loyalty in seeds can be defined as a tendency to repeatedly choose the same seed brand or variety out of preference or commitment
To understand loyalty, we draw on several conceptual drivers
Perceived value. This is the farmer’s subjective assessment of a seed’s net benefit (quality and yield relative to cost). Perceived value is “a consumer’s subjective viewpoint or assessment” of how well a product meets needs . In seeds, higher perceived value (e.g. high germination and yield for the price) leads to repeat purchases.
Satisfaction. Customer satisfaction reflects how well the seed’s performance matches expectations. Marketing models (e.g. Anderson and Fornell 2000) show that satisfaction is the main contributor to loyalty . That is, if farmers are satisfied with a seed variety (good yields, healthy plants), they are more likely to stick with it.
Trust. Farmers often depend on companies and dealers for support, so trust is crucial. Brand trust is “the level of esteem and allegiance that consumers have towards a brand” and confidence in its ability to fulfill commitments . In agriculture, studies find that farmers consider trust a key determinant of loyalty, since they rely on the company’s support (e.g. technical advice, after-sales service) for new technologies . Without trust in a seed supplier or retailer, farmers will be reluctant to remain loyal.
Switching costs. These are the perceived costs (financial, time, effort, uncertainty) of changing to a different seed source . For example, if a farmer has invested time in learning a seed brand or expects high future returns from it, the “switching cost” (forgoing those benefits) can discourage changing brands. In general, higher switching costs reinforce loyalty; lower switching costs make farmers more willing to try new varieties.
Behavioral loyalty often reflects the above factors interacting. For instance, commitment-trust theory (Morgan & Hunt 1994) suggests that strong trust and perceived value build commitment, which in turn drives repeat purchase. In practical terms, if a farmer believes a seed brand is high-value and trustworthy, he or she will commit to it and buy repeatedly, even if alternatives exist.
Empirical Findings in India
A growing literature has examined seed purchase patterns among Indian farmers. Recent studies in various states reveal how loyalty (or lack thereof) plays out:
Andhra Pradesh (Chilli). Hussain et al. (2020) surveyed Guntur chili farmers and found a strong link between yields and loyalty. When a chili seed brand delivered higher yields, farmers “increased tendency to repetitive purchase of that brand,” even if the seed cost more . In other words, good performance trumped price; farmers shifted to the best-performing hybrid and kept buying it. This study also noted that farmers repeatedly bought a high-yielding brand “irrespective of cost” , highlighting how yield performance can create loyalty.
Andhra Pradesh (Tomato). Bala Krishna et al. (2020) studied tomato growers in Chittoor, AP. They found that even high seed cost did not deter farmers from switching to a superior hybrid: “majority of farmers prefer and shifting to [the hybrid] Sahoo variety… because of its high yield potential, resistance to pest and diseases,” despite its higher price. In fact, they concluded that when a seed gives good yields, farmers tend toward “repetitive purchase of that brand… irrespective of cost” . This confirms that in tomato also, yield and quality drive loyalty.
Jharkhand (Tomato). Nagesia and Thakkar (2024) surveyed Latehar tomato growers. They report that farmers in the study area were “well-informed about hybrid tomato seeds” and already displayed strong brand loyalty to major companies (e.g. Syngenta, Nunhems, Seminis, Namdhari) . The top purchase factors cited were yield and fruit quality; ‘dealer influence’ ranked only fourth among factors . This suggests that brand reputation (from past performance) and product traits matter more than advertising. The authors note that seed companies could boost loyalty with formal programs: “by implementing loyalty programs, seed companies can improve their market presence and farmer satisfaction.
Maharashtra (Watermelon). Yashwant Mahajan’s (2022) study in Nashik assessed watermelon growers’ loyalty. He found that only 8% of farmers “always buy the same product each year,” while 30% “most often” do so; 14% “never” repeat; and 48% “rarely” repeat . Thus only about 38% of farmers showed consistent repeat purchasing (always/most often), while nearly half rarely stuck to the same seed each year. This indicates generally weak loyalty in that sample: many farmers switched brands frequently. (Factors driving switches were not detailed, but availability issues likely played a role.
Tamil Nadu (Vegetable hybrids). A Coimbatore study (Sivakami et al. 2021) of hybrid vegetable seed buyers found that brand loyalty was low. The authors reported that “brand loyalty of the farmers towards seed companies was low, as their brand switching behaviour was very high due to non-availability of seeds, low yield, high seed price, pest and disease attack” . In other words, if a farmer’s preferred hybrid was unavailable or underperformed, she switched brands. In this survey, the highest satisfaction was for seed availability and low price, while yield and quality scored lower. This underlines that inconsistent supply and performance issues reduce loyalty.
Gujarat (Chilli). Although a detailed study was not open-access, a related Gujarat survey found that demonstration plots and dealer influence were important: one report notes that “dealers suggestion” was the largest purchase influencer (34%) in cotton, and farmers also valued yield, price, and availability 20 (though this was in cotton). For chilli specifically, research (Madhya Pradesh) similarly shows that quality and yield matter more than marketing.
Others. In general, studies across India show that when farmers experience a reliable, high performing seed, they tend to buy it repeatedly, creating loyalty. Conversely, inconsistent quality or poor customer service drives switches. A pattern emerges: loyalty is earned by delivering on seed quality and support.
Key Drivers of Farmer Loyalty
Empirical studies and theory point to several key drivers that determine whether a farmer remains loyal to a seed brand or switches:
Seed Quality and Yield Performance. By far the most-cited driver of repeat purchases is the seed’s agronomic performance. Farmers continually assess whether a hybrid lives up to expectations for germination rate, yield potential, taste/marketability, and resistance to pests and diseases. A seed that consistently produces high yields and healthy plants builds confidence. As Hussain et al. found, “when a specific brand gives good crop yields…the tendency of farmers increased to repetitive purchase of that brand” . Similarly, Bala Krishna et al. noted that even expensive tomato seeds were repeatedly bought because of “high yield potential” and disease resistance . Unreliable seed quality, on the other hand, quickly erodes loyalty: Coimbatore growers reported switching brands when “low yield” or seedborne diseases occurred . Thus seed quality (including genetic purity, germination, vigor, and consistency) is the foremost driver.
Brand Reputation and Perception. Beyond objective performance, farmers develop perceptions of seed brands. Well-known national or multinational companies often carry a reputation for quality hybrids. For instance, Jharkhand farmers showed loyalty to globally recognized brands (Syngenta, Nunhems) as “well-known seed brands” . After first-hand or neighboring experience, farmers judge a brand’s reliability. Successful brands also invest in long term advertising and extension, which can shape perception. In the tomato study, brands like Sahoo (a local brand) earned a reputation that overcame their higher cost . In markets where counterfeit seeds are common, brand labels on packaging become even more salient signals of authenticity and quality. In short, positive brand image (built on quality and consistent availability) fosters loyalty, whereas a tarnished brand will lose repeat buyers.
Dealer Relationships and Service. In India’s seed value chain, local agro-dealers and retailers are often the interface between farmers and seed companies. Trust in these dealers influences loyalty. Studies indicate that dealer recommendations play a substantial role in purchase decisions . If a dealer consistently stocks a brand and provides advice, farmers may lean on that brand. Conversely, if a desired seed is “non-available” in season (as noted in Coimbatore ), farmers must switch. After-sales support (such as agronomic advice) provided by dealers or company representatives also matters. As one qualitative study emphasizes, farmers “depend on the agribusiness’s support” (technical help, information) and thus trust in the dealer/rep is a crucial brand loyalty determinant . Therefore, strong relationships and good service from dealers strengthen loyalty.
Availability and Supply. Timely availability of seeds at sowing time is a practical necessity. If seed stocks run out or a new hybrid is not sold locally, farmers are forced to switch brands or use saved seed. The perception of reliable supply is hence important. For example, Coimbatore farmers ranked “availability of quality seeds” as a key factor , while unavailability was explicitly cited as a reason for brand switching . In the Latehar study, the least important factors were credit and packaging, whereas availability often came higher. In summary, frequent unavailability undermines loyalty, and companies that ensure steady supply reinforce repeat buying.
Credit and Financing. Access to credit can facilitate purchases of costly hybrid seeds. Some private companies or dealers offer buy-now-pay-later arrangements, linking seed sales to fertilizer or loan packages. One might expect this to build loyalty. However, studies suggest credit is a weaker driver than quality. The Jharkhand tomato survey found “availability on credit” to be among the least influential factors in purchasing . Similarly, in a watermelon study, credit availability was noted but often ranked lower than yield and price. This implies that while f inancing can help adoption, once the seed proves its worth, farmers repay through yields rather than loyalty. Thus credit alone does not guarantee repeated purchases unless paired with real benefits.
Price and Value. Seed price is always a consideration, especially for smallholders. In surveys, farmers cite price as an important factor but typically subordinate to yield. For instance, Tamil Nadu farmers expressed lower satisfaction with high seed price . However, the Andhra studies showed farmers willing to pay premium for performance . In behavioral theory terms, price enters into perceived value: if a higher-priced seed yields much more, its value is seen as higher . On the other hand, excessively high or unfair pricing can erode loyalty if the seed’s performance does not justify it. Companies must therefore balance price and communicated value.
Dealer Relationships and Service. In India’s seed value chain, local agro-dealers and retailers are often the interface between farmers and seed companies. Trust in these dealers influences loyalty. Studies indicate that dealer recommendations play a substantial role in purchase decisions . If a dealer consistently stocks a brand and provides advice, farmers may lean on that brand. Conversely, if a desired seed is “non-available” in season (as noted in Coimbatore ), farmers must switch. After-sales support (such as agronomic advice) provided by dealers or company representatives also matters. As one qualitative study emphasizes, farmers “depend on the agribusiness’s support” (technical help, information) and thus trust in the dealer/rep is a crucial brand loyalty determinant . Therefore, strong relationships and good service from dealers strengthen loyalty. 9 Availability and Supply. Timely availability of seeds at sowing time is a practical necessity. If seed stocks run out or a new hybrid is not sold locally, farmers are forced to switch brands or use saved seed. The perception of reliable supply is hence important. For example, Coimbatore farmers ranked “availability of quality seeds” as a key factor , while unavailability was explicitly cited as a reason for brand switching . In the Latehar study, the least important factors were credit and packaging, whereas availability often came higher. In summary, frequent unavailability undermines loyalty, and companies that ensure steady supply reinforce repeat buying.
Credit and Financing. Access to credit can facilitate purchases of costly hybrid seeds. Some private companies or dealers offer buy-now-pay-later arrangements, linking seed sales to fertilizer or loan packages. One might expect this to build loyalty. However, studies suggest credit is a weaker driver than quality. The Jharkhand tomato survey found “availability on credit” to be among the least influential factors in purchasing . Similarly, in a watermelon study, credit availability was noted but often ranked lower than yield and price. This implies that while f inancing can help adoption, once the seed proves its worth, farmers repay through yields rather than loyalty. Thus credit alone does not guarantee repeated purchases unless paired with real benefits.
Price and Value. Seed price is always a consideration, especially for smallholders. In surveys, farmers cite price as an important factor but typically subordinate to yield. For instance, Tamil Nadu farmers expressed lower satisfaction with high seed price . However, the Andhra studies showed farmers willing to pay premium for performance . In behavioral theory terms, price enters into perceived value: if a higher-priced seed yields much more, its value is seen as higher . On the other hand, excessively high or unfair pricing can erode loyalty if the seed’s performance does not justify it. Companies must therefore balance price and communicated value.
Perceived Risk and Switching Costs. Adopting a new seed or brand carries risk (of poor germination, etc.). Farmers weigh this risk; a “switching cost” may be emotional (fear of failure) or financial. Sometimes farmers stick with a known brand simply to avoid the uncertainty of an unknown one. In some Indian contexts, this means legacy local varieties enjoy inertia. However, in many vegetable crops, the lure of significantly higher returns from hybrids (especially in market-demanded varieties) tends to override inertia. The concept of switching costs mainly explains why some farmers hold on to a brand after positive experience. If a farmer “commits” to a brand (after trust is built), the switching cost of leaving is high because it sacrifices known outcomes. Thus, companies that build early trust can effectively lock in loyalty through perceived switching costs.
Collectively, these drivers interact. For example, a company may use a “perceived value” strategy (demonstrating superior yield) to create satisfaction and trust, which then manifest as loyalty. Marketing must address multiple drivers at once: ensure consistent seed quality (increasing satisfaction and trust), maintain supply (reducing switching due to stockouts), engage dealers (building relational trust), and price the product to reflect value.
Marketing Strategies to Build Loyalty
Private seed companies employ several tactics to encourage repeat purchases among farmers:
Demonstration Plots and Field Days. Company-sponsored demos allow farmers to see a seed’s performance under real conditions. Almost universally, vegetable seed firms use on-farm demonstration plots to showcase new hybrids. Studies note that field demonstrations and farmer field days are “the most common promotional activities” for hybrid vegetable seeds. By witnessing high yields and plant vigor firsthand, farmers gain confidence in a brand. For example, a program distributing mini-packet seeds for trial in Bangladesh found that special demonstrations and field days built trust and adoption . In India too, companies like Rasi Seeds and Namdhari have long used demo plots to win farmer loyalty. Seeing the yield advantages directly often leads farmers to stick with the shown variety in the next season, as trust in its quality grows.
Credit Incentives and Bundled Financing. To overcome farmers’ cash constraints, some companies offer credit or bundled packages. For instance, companies may tie seed sales to micro-loans or trade promotions (buy seed, get fertilizer credit). These programs can attract initial buyers. However, as noted, credit alone isn’t enough for loyalty unless the crop succeeds. Ideally, agribusinesses use credit incentives to encourage trial, then rely on quality performance to secure repeat purchases. Empirically, few studies quantify credit’s loyalty effect directly, but best practice suggests that linking credit to satisfaction (e.g. refund if poor germination) could strengthen trust.
Innovative Packaging (Mini-Packets). Small pack sizes make high-quality seed affordable to marginal farmers. India has seen a “mini-packet revolution” in vegetable seeds, where 10–50 gram packs of premium hybrids are sold affordably. This strategy itself is a marketing tool: it lowers the barrier to trying a new variety. After trial, if the seed performs well, farmers repurchase standard packs. (A BEAM study noted that mini-packets were often promoted via community demos , leading to repeated purchases.) Packaging also involves labeling and branding: clear, attractive labels (possibly in local languages) can reassure farmers of authenticity. For example, seed companies highlight brand logos and may include market contact info to help farmers report problems, building trust.
Branding and Loyalty Programs. Some companies create formal “club” programs for farmers. While rare in India’s seed trade, the concept of loyalty points (for example, exchanging receipts for rewards) is beginning. More common are informal loyalty drivers: if a company regularly communicates (through WhatsApp groups or extension agents), offers tips, and invites farmers to events, it nurtures a loyal relationship. Advertising and community outreach (such as sponsoring agripreneur fairs) also reinforce brand presence. Although quantitative data on such 5 programs in India’s vegetable sector is limited, businesses view them as ways to deepen farmer engagement and foster repeat purchases .
In sum, successful seed marketing combines demonstration of value (via demos and evidence) with relationship-building (via dealers, credit, communication) so that farmers come to trust and prefer one brand. Companies that neglect any of these elements (for example, fail to ensure supply during peak season) may lose farmers to competitors.
Challenges to Farmer Loyalty
Despite best efforts, several challenges in India can undermine farmer loyalty in seeds:
Counterfeit and Spurious Seeds. The market is plagued by fake or substandard seeds. A recent ICAR study notes that farmers face “spurious seed, low germination percentage and unavailability of quality seeds” as major problems . Spurious seeds (fake labels) directly erode loyalty – if a farmer unknowingly buys a counterfeit and gets poor yields, she may blame the brand. Even honest farmers may distrust packaged seeds if counterfeits are common in the market. For example, a major media report detailed how bogus “improved” seeds were sold to farmers, causing crop failures (a case alleging a ₹10,000 crore scam) . Counterfeit seeds diminish faith in all suppliers, making farmers wary of repeating purchases. Combating this requires stricter regulation and traceability to assure farmers of quality
Seasonal Availability and Fragmented Markets. Vegetable crops are highly seasonal, and seed demand peaks before each planting season. Logistics bottlenecks or low carrying stocks can lead to shortfalls. Small pack sizes help, but still, if a farmer’s preferred hybrid sells out, she must switch. Moreover, India’s smallholder-dominated landscape means that demand is spread out; reaching remote areas is costly. Distribution gaps (especially for newer brands) can force farmers to buy whatever is available, breaking loyalty. For instance, in one survey farmers explicitly cited “non-availability of seeds” as forcing brand switches .
Price Pressure and Input Costs. Rising costs of hybrids can pressure loyalty. Even if a seed performs well, the need to save costs may push farmers to try lower-priced alternatives. While many are willing to pay more for proven yield (as shown earlier ), there is always a subset highly price-sensitive, especially in commodity vegetables (like okra) where margins are tight. If multiple brands have similar performance, price wars can weaken brand loyalty. Private companies must balance R&D costs and pricing so as not to push farmers away; cooperative schemes (like group discounts for FPOs) can help sustain loyalty among cost-conscious growers.
Regulatory and Quality Gaps. Although India has the Seeds Act (1966) and Plant Varieties Act (2001), enforcement gaps remain. Certification processes can be slow or under-staffed, leading some low-quality seed to slip through. Farmers know, for example, that official certification exists but they also hear of corrupt certification or grey-market seeds. This regulatory uncertainty can diminish farmer confidence in even reputed brands. (The ICAR report above emphasizes the need for intervention.) Additionally, intellectual property issues (like royalty disputes) can cause friction with seed companies. Strengthening seed law enforcement and rapid quality testing would bolster the system, giving farmers more confidence to remain loyal to certified products.
Climatic Variability and Risk. Unpredictable weather can make any crop a gamble. Even a high yielding hybrid can fail under extreme weather. Farmers may attribute such failures to seed 6 rather than weather, unfairly damaging loyalty. Building trust requires after-the-fact support (e.g. agronomy advice) so farmers do not abandon a brand after one bad season. Some companies now offer crop insurance or buyback guarantees to mitigate this risk, indirectly supporting loyalty.
Case Examples by Crop
Tomato. Tomato is a major vegetable crop in India, widely grown in AP, Bihar, Maharashtra, etc. Many farmers have experienced first-hand the benefits of hybrids. For example, in Chittoor district (AP) farmers switched en masse to the high-yielding hybrid ‘Sahoo’ despite its higher cost . In Jharkhand, study participants ranked tomato yield and quality highest among purchase factors ; after experiencing a good hybrid, they reported repeat purchases of that brand. The case of Chennai-based Namdhari Seeds (not a peer source, but illustrative) shows that by offering multiple tomato hybrids and demo support, they have retained a loyal customer base across states. Overall, loyalty in tomato often depends on getting the first planting right – a farmer with a bumper hybrid crop in year 1 will likely use the same variety again.
Chilli. Guntur district in AP is the country’s chili capital. Several hybrid chilli seeds (e.g. varieties from Nandyal or Rasi Seeds) dominate the market. Hussain et al. found that good yield from a chilli hybrid created repeat buying. For instance, if a farmer finds that Hybrid X gives 20% more yield than a competitor, he will order Hybrid X again next season. Brand name plays a role – big companies like Indo-American or Devi Seeds have loyal followings. However, pest resistance is also key: a hybrid that resists wilt or fruit rot more effectively will win loyalty. Counterfeit chili seeds in AP do exist, so packaging that guarantees purity (and maybe farmer testimonials) is used by firms to keep trust.
Brinjal (Eggplant). Hybrid brinjal seed has seen rapid adoption where pests are severe. A well-known 2007 study found that in Karnataka 90% of farmers sampled already planted hybrid brinjal . This implies that those farmers repeatedly buy hybrids; adoption is so high that open-pollinated varieties have “rarely been encountered” . Companies like Mahyco and Ankur benefit from this loyalty. In West Bengal (where hybrids were <1% due to wilt risk) loyalty to hybrids was low , showing that local agro ecology affects loyalty patterns. Once a farmer in Karnataka got good yields from the Bt brinjal hybrids (before their moratorium), virtually all subsequent brinjal seed purchases were for hybrids of that brand.
Okra. Vegetable farmers in Gujarat and Tamil Nadu have had notable examples of loyalty to okra hybrids. In Gujarat, one farmer reported buying multiple varieties from Nunhems (Sarvottam, Singham, etc.) because they “sell instantly” at market and yield was high (Nunhems success story). Similarly in Tamil Nadu, a leading farmer said the okra variety Selvam “sells instantly” even in glut, and became his “trusted source of sustained income” . (These are corporate-reported anecdotes, not academic citations, but they illustrate common farmer behavior: success breeds loyalty.) In Maharashtra, sunflower okra hybrids have also taken off, with seed companies reporting repeat orders by progressive growers. The key with okra is consistency across seasons – a farmer will keep buying what has proven reliable.
Conclusion and Recommendations
In summary, farmer loyalty in India’s private vegetable seed market hinges on delivering real value and building trust. Repeat purchases occur when seeds reliably perform (high yield, quality, disease resistance) and are backed by good service. Conversely, poor quality or supply failures quickly lead farmers to try other brands. Empirical studies across states consistently show that yield and quality outrank price in driving loyalty ; satisfied farmers return. Behavioral theory (perceived value and satisfaction models) confirms that meeting or exceeding expectations leads to repeated buying . Trust and relationship factors (e.g. dealer support) further reinforce loyalty .
For seed companies and marketers: continue to invest in quality assurance and R&D for high performing hybrids. Use farmer-demonstrations aggressively to prove value and gain buy-in. Ensure timely and widespread seed availability (e.g. through robust distribution and mini-packets). Cultivate dealer loyalty by training and incentivizing retailers to promote your brands. Consider loyalty schemes or farmer groups to share best practices. Transparency (e.g. batch tracing, transparent pricing) will build trust.
For agri-dealers: stock the varieties that demonstrably work for farmers, and counsel farmers based on field experience. Facilitate small credit if needed, but emphasize seed performance first. Follow up with customers post-sale to help with agronomy, which will make them more likely to reorder.
For policymakers: strengthen regulation and enforcement to eliminate spurious seeds, so that farmers can trust brand claims . Support public–private seed R&D partnerships to improve hybrid offerings. Facilitate farmer awareness of seed certification and quality. Finally, policies that expand rural credit and extension can indirectly support loyalty by enabling more farmers to afford premium hybrids and use them effectively.
By focusing on these drivers, the vegetable seed industry can nurture stronger farmer-company relationships. Loyal farmers are an asset: they provide stable demand and free word-of-mouth promotion. Achieving this loyalty will improve productivity and livelihoods, contributing to food security and rural development.
%20(2).png)
0 Comments