GENETIC APPROACHES FOR FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS
•
The main aim of
genetic approaches to link between genotype and phenotype
• There are mainly
two approaches i.e., Forward genetics and Reverse genetics. Both these
processes aim to determine the function of a gene
Forward genetics approaches: From phenotype to
genotype
Forward
genetics , in which one starts with a particular identified phenotype and the
gene sequence is ultimately deduced through screening large numbers of individuals
for phenotypic variations.
Reverse genetic approach : From
genotype to phenotype
• The gene
sequence is known and mutants are screened to identify individuals with
structural alterations in the gene of interest.
• Reverse genetic approach is generally less time
demanding Reverse genetic strategies have been successfully used for functional
genomics in many animal and plant species. The widespread availability of
sequence data allows researchers to rapidly design reverse genetic strategies
to determine gene function.
Methods to reverse genetic approaches:
•
Homologous
recombination
•
Agro-bacterium mediated
insertional mutagenesis
•
Transposon
tagging
•
Rnai (RNA interference) or PTGS (Post
Transcriptional Gene Silencing)
•
Chemical
mutagenesis followed by detection of mutation through TILLING
•
Detection of natural polymorphism by EcoTILLING.
TILLING (Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes) is a non-transgenic reverse genetic technique that is suitable for most plants. For TILLING, mutations are created by treatment with the same chemical mutagens that have been successfully employed in mutation breeding programs for decades. By using chemical mutagens that induce primarily random point mutations at high density, allelic series of missense and truncation mutations can be discovered with TILLING. Thus with only a small population, multiple alleles may be obtained regardless of the size of the gene. Gene regions are targeted for mutation discovery using PCR and standard SNP discovery methods. The use of general techniques for the generation and discovery of mutations means that the method should be applicable to a wide variety of organisms. TILLING methodology can also be used to uncover natural nucleotide variation linked to important phenotypic traits, a process termed EcoTILLING. The current status of various plant TILLING and EcoTILLING projects discussed in this review show that the methods are generally applicable across the plant kingdom.
Steps in TILLING:
1) Development of a mutagenized population
2) DNA
Extraction and pooling
3) Mutation
discover
Developing a Mutagenized population:
•
Plants are
ideally suited for TILLING
• Traditional
mutagenesis techniques have been used to create many new crop varieties [
Stadler, 1928]
•
The ideal
mutagen is one that randomly induces single nucleotide substitutions, or INDELs
at a high frequency in genome
Chemical mutagenesis:
Among the mutagens, chemical
agents play a major part and have become
popular.
Ø Ethyl methane sulfonate
(EMS)
Ø Methyl
methane sulfonate (MMS)
Ø Ethyl nitroso urea (ENU)
Ø Sodium azide
Ø Methyl-Nitrosourea ( MNU)
Alkylating agents (EMS),
which yield predominantly point
mutations, have been especially valuable
for TILLING.
Selecting Tissue for Mutations:
•
The optimal
tissue is one that produces non-chimeric plants harbouring a high density of
induced mutations
•
Seeds are frequently used
•
But in maize pollen will be treated with the
mutagens
Mutagenized population:
•
Mutagenized seeds are sown and that generation is M1
which is highly chimeric in nature
•
Selfing of individual M1 plants to get non-chimeric
M2 Population
•
M2 is a ideal Mutagenized population
•
When pollens are used M1 population is not chimeric
and can directly used for DNA extraction.
DNA
extraction:
•
Genomic DNA
samples are typically extracted from individual M2 plants
•
The DNA
extraction method used for TILLING should produce a sufficient yield and
quality of genomic DNA
DNA Pooling:
•
Samples are
normalized to a common concentration
•
Then pooled
together to reduce the cost of mutation screening (1-8 folds)
•
Pooling of up to
eight samples has been used for TILLING
•
Pooling of samples is advantageous for these reasons:
(1) More potential
heteroduplexes can be seen
(2) The number of
individuals that can be surveyed at a time is increased
Mutation
Discovery:
•
Generally Mutation discovery is nothing but SNP
Discovery (Mismatch Discovery)
SNP discovery technologies
include
•
Array-based
methods
•
Denaturing HPLC
•
Mass
spectroscopy
•
Denaturing
gradient capillary electrophoresis and
•
Enzymatic
Mismatch Cleavage
SNP discovery
through enzymatic mismatch cleavage :
•
The most common
method used is enzymatic mismatch cleavage
followed by resolution on PAGE to detect the cleaved fragments
•
The cleaved
fragments are detected by fluoresce The pooled DNA is arrayed into 96 well microtiter
plates
•
Pooled samples
are amplified using primers targeting the gene of interest
•
The forward and
reverse primers are differentially 5’ end labelled with IRD700 and IRD800 dye
labels
•
Dyes are fluorescent labels which can be
detected at ~700 nm and ~800 nm,
respectively.
•
Next,
heteroduplexes and homoduplexes are formed from the PCR products of pooled
samples
•
The endonuclease
enzyme CEL I is applied and a short incubation is required for the enzymatic
reaction
•
CEL I not only
specifically recognizes mismatches in the heteroduplex, but it also cleaves DNA
on the 3’ side of the mismatch
•
Therefore, when
fragments are separated a full length product (detected in both 700 and 800
channels) Two cleaved fragments (one
IRD700 labelled, one IRD800 labelled) will be visible
•
The sum of the
cleaved fragments should equal the full length PCR product
•
The size of the
cleaved fragments can be estimated by comparison to a size standard
•
The approximate location of the mutation will
be identified and further confirmed by sequencing The CEL I nuclease extracted
from celery is most commonly used
endonuclease (Oleykowski et al., 1998)
•
CEL I is a
single-strand specific nuclease related to S1 nuclease
•
CEL I, S1 and
Mung Bean nucleases have all been shown to be usable for mutation discovery
(Till et al., 2004).
•
Detection of
digested fragments obtained by separation on a denaturing PAGE attached to a
LI-COR 4300 DNA analysis system
• Pools containing an induced mutation will consist of a mixture of homo and heteroduplexes
Merits:
´ Cheap and rapid reverse genetic approach
´ Detection of mutation at single nucleotide level
´ Independent of genome size and used for most of the
organisms.
Demerits:
´ Skilled labour are required
´ Low rate of induction of mutation
Conclusion:
TILLING
and EcoTILLING are high-throughput and low-cost methods. The methods are general and have
successfully been applied to many plants, including crops. With sequence data
and general tools such as TILLING, reverse genetics can be applied to lesser studied
species. Now that successes have been reported in a variety of important plant
species, the next challenge will be to use the technology to develop improved
crop varieties.The utility of induced mutations
and natural polymorphism has already been
established for crop breeding and so the
task is mostly one of implementation.

0 Comments