Why do breeders conduct multi-location trials and field evaluations in crop breeding programs?

Breeders conduct multi-location trials and field evaluations in crop breeding programs to assess the performance and adaptability of new crop varieties across diverse environments, providing valuable insights into genotype-by-environment interactions and ensuring the development of robust and widely adaptable cultivars. This practice is crucial for enhancing the reliability and success of crop breeding efforts.

Study of "Genotype × Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding" information provides insights into the importance of multi-location trials and field evaluations in crop breeding programs, highlighting their role in assessing genotype performance across different environmental conditions.

Environmental Variation: Environmental factors such as climate, soil type, temperature, and precipitation vary across different geographical locations. Multi-location trials allow breeders to evaluate how new crop varieties perform under diverse environmental conditions, ensuring that cultivars are adapted to a range of agroecological zones and growing conditions.

Genotype × Environment Interaction (G × E): Genotype-by-environment interaction plays a significant role in determining the performance of crop varieties. Different genotypes may respond differently to environmental factors, leading to variation in yield and quality across locations. Multi-location trials help breeders identify genotypes with stable performance across environments and assess the magnitude of G × E interaction for targeted traits.

Selection for Adaptability: Multi-location trials enable breeders to select crop varieties with broad adaptability and stability across multiple environments. By identifying genotypes that consistently perform well across diverse locations, breeders can develop cultivars that are resilient to environmental fluctuations and provide consistent yields under varying conditions.

Trait Expression and Phenotypic Plasticity: Field evaluations allow breeders to observe the expression of target traits and phenotypic plasticity in different environments. Variations in trait expression across locations provide valuable insights into the genetic control of traits and the environmental factors influencing trait performance, guiding breeding decisions and selection strategies.

Risk Management: Conducting trials in multiple locations helps mitigate the risk of crop failure due to environmental stresses or unforeseen events. By distributing trials across different regions, breeders can reduce the impact of localized environmental factors and ensure the continuity of breeding programs, safeguarding against the loss of valuable germplasm and genetic resources.

Market Adaptation and Consumer Preferences: Multi-location trials allow breeders to assess how new crop varieties meet market demands and consumer preferences across different regions. By evaluating factors such as taste, texture, appearance, and nutritional quality in diverse environments, breeders can develop cultivars that meet the needs and preferences of target markets, enhancing market acceptance and adoption.

In summary, multi-location trials and field evaluations are essential components of crop breeding programs, providing breeders with critical information on genotype performance, adaptability, genotype-by-environment interactions, and market suitability. 

References:

Ceccarelli, S. and Grando, S., 1996. Genotype by environment interaction: challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. Euphytica, 92(1–2), pp.221–234.

Yan, W. and Hunt, L.A., 2001. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. Crop Science, 41(2), pp.656–663.

Annicchiarico, P., 2002. Genotype × environment interactions: Challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 174. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Cooper, M. and Hammer, G.L., 1996. Plant adaptation and crop improvement. Wallingford: CAB International.

Blum, A., 2010. Plant breeding for water-limited environments. New York: Springer.

Kang, M.S., 2002. Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.

Kang, M.S. and Gauch, H.G. Jr., 1996. Genotype-by-environment interaction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Akter, T., Islam, M.M., Obaida, M.K. and Haque, M.E., 2021. Multi-location trials and G×E interaction of maize hybrids under different agro-ecological zones of Bangladesh. The Open Agriculture Journal, 15, pp.102–111.

Fischer, R.A., Byerlee, D. and Edmeades, G.O., 2014. Crop yields and global food security: Will yield increase continue to feed the world? Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.

Smith, A., Cullis, B., Thompson, R. and Gilmour, A., 2005. The analysis of crop variety evaluation data in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 47(3), pp.253–270.

Asfaw, A., Almekinders, C.J.M., Struik, P.C. and Blair, M.W., 2012. Participatory plant breeding and the challenges of genotype × environment interactions. Euphytica, 186(1), pp.15–28.

Basford, K.E. and Cooper, M., 1998. Genotype × environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for breeding and selection. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 49(2), pp.153–174.

Acquaah, G., 2012. Principles of plant genetics and breeding. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A., 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6(1), pp.36–40.