Differentiating Deviations in Segregation Ratio in F2 Population

 

  

 

Linkage and epistasis can both cause deviations from expected Mendelian ratios in an F2 population, but they do so in different ways. Here’s how to differentiate the deviations:

Deviations due to Linkage:

• Expected Ratios: Deviations from the 9:3:3:1 ratio expected in a dihybrid cross due to genes being physically close on the same chromosome.
• Detection:
• Perform a test cross or backcross and observe offspring ratios.
• Calculate recombination frequencies: If less than 50%, it indicates linkage.
• Use two-point or three-point test crosses to map gene locations.
• Example: In a cross AaBb x AaBb, if genes A and B are linked, you might see more parental type combinations (AB and ab) and fewer recombinant types (Ab and aB).

 

Deviations due to Epistasis:

• Expected Ratios: Deviations from expected Mendelian ratios due to one gene masking the effect of another.
• Detection:
• Analyze phenotypic ratios in the F2 generation.
• Look for characteristic epistatic ratios such as 9:7, 12:3:1, 9:3:4, 15:1, etc.
• Example: In a cross where one gene (C) is epistatic to another gene (B), a 9:3:4 ratio might be observed in the F2 generation instead of the expected 9:3:3:1.

 

Steps to Differentiate:

1. Perform a Test Cross:
• Linkage: If genes are linked, recombination frequencies will be less than 50%, and there will be more parental types.
• Epistasis: Test crosses won’t show linkage patterns; instead, look for altered phenotypic ratios.
2. Analyze Phenotypic Ratios:
• Linkage: Look for deviations in expected phenotypic ratios that suggest certain combinations are inherited together more often than by chance.
• Epistasis: Look for non-Mendelian phenotypic ratios such as 9:7, 12:3:1, etc.
3. Genetic Mapping:
• Linkage: Use genetic mapping techniques to determine the physical distances between genes based on recombination frequencies.
• Epistasis: Mapping isn’t as relevant; instead, focus on understanding the interaction between genes.

 

Example Analysis:

Case 1: Linked Genes:

• Cross AaBb x AaBb, expecting 9:3:3:1.
• Observed ratios: 12:1:1:2.
• Test cross reveals fewer recombinant types (Ab, aB) and more parental types (AB, ab).

Conclusion: Linkage between A and B.

•  

Case 2: Epistasis:

• Cross AaBbCc x AaBbCc, expecting 27:9:9:9:3:3:3:1.
• Observed ratios: 9:3:4 (B is epistatic to C).
• Conclusion: Epistatic interaction between B and C.

 

By carefully analyzing the deviations in segregation ratios and using test crosses and genetic mapping, it’s possible to differentiate between linkage and epistasis and understand the underlying genetic interactions.