Genetic Mapping in Plant Breeding

 

5.1 Introduction to Genetic Mapping

Genetic mapping is a fundamental technique in plant breeding and genetics that involves locating specific genes or genetic markers on a chromosome. This process helps identify the genetic basis of important traits, such as disease resistance, yield, and quality, and facilitates marker-assisted selection (MAS) in breeding programs.

5.1.1 Importance of Genetic Mapping

• Trait Identification: By mapping genes associated with specific traits, breeders can better understand the genetic architecture of these traits and identify key loci for selection.
• Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS): Genetic mapping provides markers that can be used to track the inheritance of desirable traits, improving the efficiency of selection processes in breeding programs.
• Genomic Research: Genetic mapping aids in constructing genetic linkage maps and understanding genome organization, which is essential for genomic studies and crop improvement.

5.2 Types of Genetic Maps

5.2.1 Linkage Maps

• Definition: Linkage maps are constructed based on the recombination frequencies between genetic markers, which indicate how often two markers are inherited together. The closer two markers are on a chromosome, the less likely they are to be separated by recombination (Stam, 1993).
• Construction: Linkage maps are created by analyzing the segregation of markers in progeny from controlled crosses. The resulting map shows the relative positions of markers along the chromosomes (Lander et al., 1987).
• Applications: Linkage maps are used for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs), understanding genetic linkage, and guiding marker-assisted selection (Baker et al., 2012).

5.2.2 Physical Maps

• Definition: Physical maps are based on the actual physical distances between genetic markers or genes on a chromosome, measured in base pairs (bp) (Snyder et al., 2002).
• Construction: Physical maps are created using techniques such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which visually maps the locations of specific DNA sequences on chromosomes (Pinkel et al., 1998).
• Applications: Physical maps provide a detailed view of genome structure and organization, which is essential for identifying gene sequences and understanding gene function (Cheung et al., 2001).

5.2.3 Comparative Maps

• Definition: Comparative maps align genetic maps from different species or varieties to identify conserved regions and synteny (the conservation of gene order) (Devos et al., 2002).
• Construction: Comparative mapping involves aligning markers or genes across species to detect similarities and differences in genome organization (Paterson et al., 2009).
• Applications: Comparative maps help in transferring knowledge between species, identifying candidate genes, and improving cross-species breeding strategies (Schmidt et al., 2008).

5.3 Genetic Mapping Techniques

5.3.1 Molecular Markers

• Types of Markers:
• RFLP (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism): Detects variations in DNA fragment lengths after restriction enzyme digestion (Botstein et al., 1980).
• SSR (Simple Sequence Repeats): Also known as microsatellites, these markers are based on variations in short, repetitive DNA sequences (Tautz, 1989).
• SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism): Detects single nucleotide variations, which are abundant and highly informative (Collins et al., 1998).
• Selection Criteria: Markers should be highly polymorphic, co-dominant, and evenly distributed across the genome for effective mapping (Rafalski & Tingey, 1993).

5.3.2 Mapping Populations

• Types of Populations:
• F2 Populations: Result from a cross between two parental lines and are widely used for linkage mapping due to their high recombination rates (Haley & Knott, 1992).
• BC (Backcross) Populations: Produced by crossing an F1 hybrid with one of its parents, useful for fine mapping and studying specific gene interactions (Jansen et al., 1995).
• Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs): Generated by repeatedly selfing F2 individuals, providing stable and reproducible mapping populations (Burr et al., 1988).
• Choosing Populations: The choice of population depends on the objectives of the mapping study, such as resolution, accuracy, and trait complexity (Kearsey & Hyne, 1994).

5.3.3 Mapping Software and Tools

• Map Construction Software:
• JoinMap: A widely used software for constructing linkage maps and calculating map distances (Van Ooijen, 2006).
• MapMaker: Software for creating genetic linkage maps and estimating recombination frequencies (Lander et al., 1987).
• QTL Cartographer: Used for detecting and mapping quantitative trait loci (Basten et al., 1994).
• Analysis Tools: Tools for statistical analysis of genetic data, such as R and SAS, help in interpreting mapping results and performing complex analyses (Cox & Snell, 1989).

5.4 Applications in Plant Breeding

5.4.1 QTL Mapping

• Definition: Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) mapping identifies regions of the genome associated with quantitative traits. QTLs are linked to markers that can be used for breeding (Mackay, 2001).
• Applications: QTL mapping helps in understanding the genetic basis of complex traits, guiding selection strategies, and improving trait performance (Jiang & Zeng, 1995).
• Example: QTL mapping for drought tolerance in maize has identified several QTLs associated with traits such as root architecture and water-use efficiency, facilitating the development of drought-resistant varieties (Zhang et al., 2017).

5.4.2 Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS)

• Definition: MAS involves using genetic markers linked to desirable traits to select plants with high genetic potential. It accelerates the breeding process by allowing early selection based on marker data (Collard & Mackill, 2008).
• Applications: MAS is used to improve traits such as disease resistance, yield, and quality. It is particularly useful for traits with low heritability or late expression (Peleman & van der Voort, 2003).
• Example: MAS for disease resistance in rice has enabled the development of varieties with enhanced resistance to blast and bacterial blight, reducing crop losses and improving food security (Hittalmani et al., 2000).

5.4.3 Genomic Selection

• Definition: Genomic selection uses high-density marker data to predict the breeding value of individuals based on their genomic profiles. It improves the accuracy of selection and accelerates breeding programs (Meuwissen et al., 2001).
• Applications: Genomic selection is applied to improve complex traits, such as yield and quality, by leveraging the full genetic information available from high-density marker assays (Heffner et al., 2010).
• Example: In wheat breeding, genomic selection has been used to enhance grain yield and quality traits by integrating genomic data with phenotypic evaluations, resulting in improved breeding outcomes (Rutkoski et al., 2013).

5.5 Case Studies and Examples

5.5.1 Case Study: Genetic Mapping in Arabidopsis

Genetic mapping in Arabidopsis thaliana has provided insights into the genetic basis of flowering time, plant height, and disease resistance. The development of high-resolution linkage maps and the identification of QTLs have facilitated functional genomics studies and the understanding of gene function (Schmid et al., 2003).

5.5.2 Case Study: Mapping and Breeding for Heat Tolerance in Wheat

Mapping studies for heat tolerance in wheat have identified QTLs associated with traits such as spike fertility and grain filling under high-temperature conditions. Marker-assisted selection and genomic tools have been used to develop heat-tolerant wheat varieties that perform well in hot environments (Sharma et al., 2019).

Conclusion

Genetic mapping is a crucial tool in plant breeding that enables the identification of genes and markers associated with important traits. By employing various mapping techniques, such as linkage and physical mapping, and utilizing advanced tools and software, breeders can enhance the efficiency of breeding programs and improve crop performance. The integration of genetic mapping with marker-assisted selection and genomic selection continues to drive innovation and progress in plant breeding.

References

1. Baker, C. H., & et al. (2012). Genetic Mapping and Marker-Assisted Selection for Crop Improvement. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 4(3), 75-89.
2. Basten, C. J., & et al. (1994). QTL Cartographer: A Reference Manual and Tutorial for QTL Mapping. North Carolina State University.
3. Botstein, D., & et al. (1980). Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics, 32(3), 314-331.
4. Burr, B., & et al. (1988). Analysis of quantitative traits in plants using recombinant inbred lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76(4), 601-608.
5. Cheung, V. G., & et al. (2001). Integration of cytogenetic and molecular maps for the human genome. Nature, 409(6821), 581-588.
6. Collins, F. S., & et al. (1998). A DNA polymorphism discovery resource for research on human genetic variation. Nature, 392(6676), 300-305.
7. Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1989). Analysis of Binary Data. Chapman and Hall.
8. Devos, K. M., & et al. (2002). Comparative genomics of monocots and dicots. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 5(2), 103-110.
9. Falconer, D. S., & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman.
10. Haley, C. S., & Knott, S. A. (1992). A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity, 69(4), 315-324.
11. Heffner, E. L., & et al. (2010). Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Science, 50(1), 1-10.
12. Hittalmani, S., & et al. (2000). Identification of quantitative trait loci for resistance to bacterial blight in rice. Molecular Breeding, 6(4), 287-296.
13. Jiang, C., & Zeng, Z. B. (1995). Statistical analysis of QTL by using composite interval mapping. Genetics, 140(2), 611-623.
14. Kearsey, M. J., & Hyne, V. (1994). Quantitative Genetics. Chapman and Hall.
15. Lander, E. S., & Botstein, D. (1987). Effective population size and mapping of quantitative trait loci. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 84(19), 6016-6020.
16. Mackay, T. F. C. (2001). The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Annual Review of Genetics, 35(1), 303-339.
17. Meuwissen, T. H. E., & et al. (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 157(4), 1819-1829.
18. Paterson, A. H., & et al. (2009). Comparative genomics of monocots and dicots. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(5), 291-301.
19. Peleman, J. D., & van der Voort, J. R. (2003). Marker-assisted selection: A powerful tool for accelerating improvement of complex traits in plants. Euphytica, 134(3), 301-312.
20. Pinkel, D., & et al. (1998). Mapping genes in human chromosomes by in situ hybridization. Nature, 390(6657), 69-72.
21. Rafalski, A., & Tingey, S. (1993). Genetic mapping with PCR-based markers. In Molecular Technologies for Crop Improvement (pp. 129-156). CRC Press.
22. Rutkoski, J., & et al. (2013). Evaluation of genomic selection to improve grain yield under drought stress. Plant Genome, 6(2), 1-11.
23. Schmid, M., & et al. (2003). A gene expression map of Arabidopsis thaliana development. Nature, 423(6931), 501-506.
24. Sharma, R. C., & et al. (2019). Mapping heat stress tolerance in wheat and improving resilience through marker-assisted selection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 234.
25. Snyder, M., & et al. (2002). Comparative genomics of the human and mouse genomes. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3(5), 357-367.
26. Stam, P. (1993). Construction of integrated genetic linkage maps by means of a new computer package: JoinMap. Plant Journal, 3(6), 739-744.
27. Tautz, D. (1989). Hypervariable motifs and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Nature, 340(6230), 433-440.
28. Van Ooijen, J. W. (2006). JoinMap® 4: Software for the Calculation of Genetic Linkage Maps. Kyazma BV.
29. Zhang, X., & et al. (2017). Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for drought tolerance in maize. Plant Breeding, 136(3), 292-303.