Recombinant
selection is a targeted breeding strategy that harnesses genetic recombination
to create novel trait combinations and improve crop performance. Recombinant selection refers to the process of
selecting plants that result from genetic recombination the reshuffling of
alleles between parental genomes during meiosis to obtain new combinations of
desirable traits. Unlike simple selection that focuses on existing phenotypes,
recombinant selection emphasizes creating and selecting individuals with superior new genetic combinations that
neither parent may individually possess. It’s especially useful for
improving complex, quantitative traits like yield, stress tolerance, disease resistance, and quality traits controlled by
multiple genes that interact in intricate ways.
Fig 1. Stepwise process of recombinant selection in plant
breeding
Procedure for Recombinant Selection
Recombinant selection involves a series of
deliberate breeding steps designed to create
variability and capture
beneficial recombination’s.
1. Parental Selection and Crossing
Select two or more
parents with complementary desirable traits for
example, one parent with high yield potential and another with strong disease
resistance. Cross the parents to produce
an F1 generation (first-generation hybrids), combining genetic material from
both.
2. Generation of Recombination
In the F1 plants, meiosis induces crossing over, reshuffling
alleles between homologous chromosomes. This generates a population of F2
offspring (or later generations) with diverse
recombined genomes. Each offspring carries a unique genetic combination
— some may inherit the best alleles from both parents, while others may not.
3. Selection of Recombinants
Phenotypic selection: Identify and select plants displaying the
desired combination of traits (e.g., high yield and disease
resistance). Marker-assisted selection (MAS): Breeders
may also use molecular markers linked to target genes or QTLs to improve
selection accuracy, especially for complex or hidden traits (e.g., root
architecture, drought tolerance).
4. Recombination Among Selected Individuals
Cross the best-performing recombinant individuals
with one another to promote further
recombination and enhance genetic diversity. This step helps stack favourable alleles into
a single elite genetic background.
5. Repetitive Selection and Line Fixation
Repeat the cycle of selection
and recombination over multiple generations to fix the best alleles into
stable, high-performing breeding lines. This iterative process leads to
populations increasingly enriched with superior recombinants, combining multiple desired traits in
one plant.
Strategic Applications and Proven Benefits of
Recombinant Selection
Recombinant
selection has contributed significantly to plant breeding successes.
1. Generation of Novel Genetic Combinations
By reshuffling alleles, recombinant selection uncovers new, superior trait
combinations that may not exist in either parent. In maize, recombinant selection has helped
combine high grain yield from one
parent with improved drought tolerance from
another, resulting in more resilient, high-yield hybrids.
2. Accelerating Genetic Gain
Recombinant selection increases genetic gain with cumulative
improvement of a population over breeding cycles. By recombining favorable alleles from
diverse parents, breeders can fast-track improvements
in key traits like yield potential, disease resistance, or quality. In rice breeding,
recombinant selection has accelerated the development of varieties that
combine blast resistance (Pi genes) with high grain quality.
3. Simultaneous Improvement of Multiple Traits
(Trait Stacking)
Recombinant selection enables pyramiding multiple traits
into a single variety such as combining disease
resistance with heat
tolerance and early
maturity. Wheat breeders successfully combined rust resistance genes (Lr, Sr) with high grain protein content,
resulting in high-quality,
disease-resistant wheat varieties.
4. Precision Breeding with Molecular Markers
Coupling
recombinant selection with marker-assisted
selection (MAS) boosts precision. Breeders can track hidden beneficial alleles (e.g.,
root structure genes) that aren’t visible through traditional selection. In
tomatoes, recombinant selection guided by markers has allowed breeders to
combine late blight resistance with improved fruit size and sweetness traits
which were difficult to achieve simultaneously through phenotypic selection
alone.
5. Developing Climate-Resilient Crops
With climate change driving erratic weather
patterns, recombinant selection can combine alleles for drought tolerance, heat stress resistance, and salinity tolerance producing
crops better adapted to future environments. Recombinant wheat lines
combining drought-tolerance QTLs with heat-tolerance genes are now
in advanced trials, showing promise in semi-arid
regions.
Conclusion
Recombinant selection stands as a pivotal strategy
in modern plant breeding, enabling the creation and fixation of superior
genotypes through the deliberate reshuffling of genetic material. By
systematically crossing parental lines and selecting for recombinants that combine
multiple desirable traits, breeders can address the complexities of polygenic
traits such as yield, stress tolerance, and disease resistance. The integration
of molecular tools, particularly marker-assisted selection, enhances the
precision and efficiency of this approach, allowing for the identification of
hidden genetic potential and the pyramiding of traits that would be challenging
to combine through phenotypic selection alone. As agriculture faces the dual
challenge of increasing productivity and adapting to climate change,
recombinant selection provides a robust framework for developing
climate-resilient, high performing crop varieties. Its capacity to accelerate
genetic gains, facilitate trait stacking, and enable precision breeding makes
it indispensable for the next generation of plant improvement programs. When
complemented by advances in genomic selection and gene-editing technologies,
recombinant selection will continue to evolve as a cornerstone of sustainable
and innovative crop breeding.
References
Collard, B.C.Y. and Mackill, D.J., 2008.
Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the
twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences, 363(1491), pp.557-572.
Bernardo, R., 2008. Molecular markers and selection
for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Science,
48(5), pp.1649–1664.
Xu, Y. and Crouch, J.H., 2008. Marker-assisted
selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Science,
48(2), pp.391-407.
Ribaut, J.M. and Ragot, M., 2007. Marker-assisted
selection to improve drought adaptation in maize: the backcross approach,
perspectives, limitations, and alternatives. Journal of Experimental Botany,
58(2), pp.351–360.
Moose, S.P. and Mumm, R.H., 2008. Molecular plant
breeding as the foundation for 21st century crop improvement. Plant Physiology,
147(3), pp.969–977.
Hospital, F., 2001. Size of donor chromosome
segments around introgressed loci and reduction of linkage drag in
marker-assisted backcross programs. Genetics, 158(3), pp.1363–1379.
Tanksley, S.D. and Nelson, J.C., 1996. Advanced
backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of
valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theoretical
and Applied Genetics, 92(2), pp.191–203.
Semagn, K., Bjørnstad, Å. and Ndjiondjop, M.N.,
2006. An overview of molecular marker methods for plants. African Journal of
Biotechnology, 5(25), pp.2540–2568.
Singh, B.D. and Singh, A.K., 2020. Marker-Assisted
Plant Breeding: Principles and Practices. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Springer Nature.
Varshney, R.K., Terauchi, R. and McCouch, S.R.,
2014. Harvesting the promising fruits of genomics: applying genome sequencing
technologies to crop breeding. PLoS Biology, 12(6), p.e1001883.
Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Chen, W., Li, Y., Xia, X.,
Chen, Q., Lei, T., and He, Z., 2012. Molecular mapping of QTLs for yield, yield
components, and morphological traits in wheat under varying environments.
Euphytica, 186, pp.207–222.
0 Comments