For decades, the stock market has been treated like a nightly weather report—something we’re expected to check, track, and worry about. Headlines celebrate record-breaking highs, billion-dollar IPOs, and “booming” markets. Yet most people continue to ask the same fundamental question:
If the stock market keeps rising, why doesn’t life feel more prosperous for the average person?
To understand that disconnect, we need to explore what stock markets actually measure, how they influence corporate behavior, and why rising indexes often don’t reflect the economic reality of ordinary families.
📌 What the Stock Market Really Measures
To decode the stock market, imagine something simple:
A lemonade stand.
A small business owner (let’s call her Jill) wants to expand but can’t get a loan. She decides to issue shares—tiny pieces of her business that anyone can buy. When she goes public through an IPO, people buy her shares based on what they believe her future profits will be.
That’s the essence of the stock market:
➡️ People buying and selling pieces of companies based on future expectations—not present realities.
In real markets, this happens thousands of times per second across exchanges like:
- New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) – big, traditional companies
- NASDAQ – tech-heavy, digital companies
To make market performance easier to track, index numbers like the Dow and S&P 500 are used. They combine multiple companies into one easy-to-understand figure.
But here’s the catch:
Indexes reflect stock prices, not national prosperity.
📌 The Heart of the Disconnect: Stock Market ≠ Real Economy
While stock indexes have soared over the last 40 years, something else has stagnated:
- Real wages
- Middle-class wealth
- Job security
- Cost of living
- Economic mobility
Even though the S&P 500 and Dow keep hitting new highs, actual economic growth (GDP) has slowed. The middle class has shrunk. Many families never fully recovered from the 2008 recession.
Why?
Because the stock market has increasingly rewarded short-term profit maximization, not long-term economic health.
📌 How “Shareholder First” Thinking Changed Everything
In the 1970s, economist Milton Friedman popularized the idea that a company’s sole purpose is to maximize profits for shareholders.
This led to:
1. CEO Pay Tied to Share Prices
Executives began receiving huge bonuses based on stock performance, incentivizing short-term decisions.
2. Massive Stock Buybacks
Companies started using their earnings—not to expand, innovate, or raise wages—but to buy back their own shares.
This reduces supply and artificially pushes prices upward.
Between 2007 and 2016:
- Over 50% of S&P 500 profits went to stock buybacks
- Another 39% went to dividends
- Only ~11% was left for innovation, expansion, or wage increases
3. Cutting Costs at Any Price
To raise short-term profits, many companies:
- Closed factories
- Laid off workers
- Shifted production overseas
- Reduced benefits
Shareholders celebrated. Workers suffered.
📌 The Human Cost: A Real Example
Wausau Paper, a Wisconsin paper company, was investing for the long-term—shifting from printing paper to tissue manufacturing. But when a hedge fund bought a large stake, it demanded immediate cost-cutting instead of long-term investments.
The outcome?
- The mill shut down
- 450 workers lost their jobs
- A community lost its economic backbone
But the shareholders made money.
This isn’t an isolated story—it's a nationwide pattern driven by corporate short-termism.
📌 When Stock Market Booms Become Bubbles
Market hype often fuels unrealistic expectations.
Example: The Dot-Com Bubble.
In the 1990s, investors poured money into internet companies—many without profits, products, or business models. When reality hit, trillions of dollars vanished, millions lost jobs, and retirement accounts were destroyed.
This cycle—hype → boom → bubble → crash—repeats because stock markets reward popular stories, not necessarily real value.
Esteemed economist John Maynard Keynes described markets as a “beauty contest” where people don’t choose what they find best, but what they think others will choose.
In other words:
Stock prices are driven by collective psychology as much as economic fundamentals.
📌 Inequality and the Market: Who Really Benefits?
As markets skyrocketed:
- CEO pay ballooned from 22 times the average worker’s salary (1973)
- to 271 times (2016)
- Fewer Americans own stocks than at any point in 20 years
- Wealth has concentrated at the top
In summary:
A rising stock market has increasingly meant rising inequality—not rising prosperity.
📌 So… Is the Stock Market Still Good for Society?
It can be.
When markets work properly, they:
✔️ Reward innovation
✔️ Help great ideas get funding
✔️ Encourage entrepreneurship
✔️ Build long-term wealth
✔️ Support economic growth
But that requires a shift away from short-term shareholder obsession and toward sustainable, ethical, long-term value creation—involving employees, communities, environment, and future generations.
Most investors actually prefer companies that:
- Treat workers fairly
- Act ethically
- Create long-term value
- Innovate responsibly
When enough shareholders demand this, companies do listen.
📌 Conclusion: What the Stock Market Should Measure
The stock market should be a reflection of:
- Innovation
- Long-term value
- Economic growth
- Responsible leadership
- Shared prosperity
But today, it often reflects speculative hype and short-term profit chasing.
Understanding this gap helps us make smarter decisions as investors—and as citizens.
%20(2).png)
0 Comments